32
mindaugas.dadurkevicius
11 31 50
5848/ 6195
Mindaugas D.
Last seen 1 month ago
Member for 6 years, 6 months, 19 days
Difficulty Normal
Best reviews / Newest reviews
Voice TV Control-JimmyCarlos 2
Very clear. Yet channelIndexOn variable name could have been shorter :D More
*Spooky Solution-JimmyCarlos 1 1
Very strange solution, but probably that was the point :D More
Uhhh... It's done! )-masterspace.dc 1
I would recommend start using build-in python functions to make your code more readable. For instance, in line 14 you could just write "if lst:" instead of calling len() function. Also, if you want to take it further, then your length(lst) function could just have been like: s = sum(map(lambda n More
Seven Segment-JimmyCarlos 1
Nice solution, yet too many comments for those, who already solved it. More
Wall Keeper-JimmyCarlos 1 1
I like that you commented about every function as in such long code it can be difficult to understand how elements of it interact. More
Friendly Number-JimmyCarlos 1 1
I think you could have made a simpler solution to this. Also, excessive explanations (keep in mind, your readers have solved this mission) More
The Angles of a Triangle-JimmyCarlos 1 1
Nice code. Though you could have replaced three statements in line 9 with one statement, for instance: if max(a,b,c) >= sum(a,b,c) - max(a,b,c) More
Time Converter (12h to 24h)-colinmcnicholl 1 1
Clear, but you could have simplified it to less cases (for instance amounting to length by reading everything to left from ':' and reading minutes as two symbols after ':' More
Fizz Buzz-ouhuazheng 1 1
For publishing it is recommended to delete useless comments and asserts (we already know it passed tests if you are publishing it). More
*Code Golf-JimmyCarlos 1 1
Nice shortening! I couldn't have done better. More
First-kostya241
Nice and simple, you could just have deleted the tests before publishing. More
First-Molot
Very well writen. For future I would recommend adjusting indentation (lines 3 and 5) and deleting asserts before publishing. More
First-kalauroma7997 1
Good solution, next time it could be more readable if you have removed asserts. More
First-wrak
Good solution, next time it could be more readable if you have removed asserts. More
First-ForrestGump
Good solution, next time it could be more readable if you have removed asserts. More
Digit Stack-svisho1983
Good solution, next time it could be more readable if you have removed asserts. More
Using Split()-Pooja_Checkio
Clean lines after 7. Name variables more comprehensibly. More
Only if-Binara 1
For publishing it is recommended to delete useless comments and asserts (we already know it passed tests if you are publishing it). More
Easy Unpack-Pooja_Checkio
Clean lines after 6 and you could also delete lines 2-5 More
Fizz Buzz-lz0499
For publishing it is recommended to delete useless comments and asserts (we already know it passed tests if you are publishing it). More
1
2