45
bryukh
16 32 48
15857/ 17173
Valentin Bryukhanov http://bryukh.com/
Last seen 2 years ago
Member for 11 years, 7 months, 15 days
Difficulty Normal
Developer, engineer and taskMaker.

Best reviews / Newest reviews
First-Renelvon 14 1
This is original and interesting solution, but is not "Clear" for newbies. I would give you thumbsUp if it was in a different category. More
First-Renelvon 5 1
Interesting. But for the "clear" category you can add some comments (for newbies). More
Optimistic-veky 3 1
We need to do something with code highlighter -- it's hard to read oneliners with scrolling (for chrome in mac) Great solution! More
First-Bibiche 2
You "reinvented the wheel" here for many cases :) More
First-asa119 2 1
Awesome. Maybe it's not "clear" for newbies but I like this. More
Obvious-veky 2 1
Ha. Nice! I just saw it. The interesting idea to break all links (instead rings) and look for the best of them. Brilliant! More
First-Amachua 2 2
It's like to the code golf with Java names :) Interesting solution. More
Third-Bibiche 2
Nice. Some remarks -- too long lines and we don't know French :) More
Adjustment-veky 2 1
count += w2 > 4 Nice, if honestly, i didn't get it at first. It's not obvious type conversation, but interesting. More
Boo-Juge_Ti 1
I know him! It's Pacman's ghost!!! More
First-zaneli 1 1
Why? result_v = check_vertical(matrix) if result_v: return True It can be shorter and simpler: if check_vertical(matrix): return True Or you can simplify the whole function: return check_vertical(matrix) or check_horizontal or check_diagonal More
First-Majavar 1
Good. Only one remark - 'l' is the bad name for variable, because it very similar to "1" for some fonts. Without syntax highlighting it can complicate the code reading. More
First-htamas 1
Thanks. This is the original solution and interesting method with rotations. It's something new. More
LIB 004 The Most Numbers-Grimtyler 1 1
> round(diff,4) This is not necessary More
First-RRRQ 1 1
I can not see the author of this solution, because I use Random Review. But it looks like mine -- the same mistake with "except". More
Ugly bruteforce-Amachua 1 1
Yeah, the third loop is redundant even for bruteforce :) More
First-ForrestGump 1
line 4-7 can be simpler if alpha not in text: return False More
First-Don.He 1 1
One little advice -- "sum" is a builtin function in python and using it as a variable name is not a good idea. More
First-eugen.stegnij 1
I didn't get why do you use "*a" here. A input tuple become a == ((data),) and then you unwrap it again. list conversion are redundant -- "sorted" can work with tuples too. And "lambda x: abs(x)" is the same as "abs". So you can use "key=abs". P.S. PEP8 is a good choice for "Clear" ca More
Cheating :)-weerd 1 1
Ha ha :) Super! It's really funny. You just made my day. More
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8